uk.environment.conservation

On Feb 21, 11:31 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:18:29 -0800 (PST), "John M."
>
>
>
> wrote:
> >On Feb 20, 8:39 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:35:35 +0000, Malcolm
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >In article ,
> >> >amacmil...@aol.com writes
> >> >>On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:33:50 +0000, Malcolm
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >>>In article ,
> >> >>>amacmil...@aol.com writes
> >> >>>>On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:01:03 +0000, Malcolm
> >> >>>> wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>In article ,
> >> >>>>>amacmil...@aol.com writes
> >> >>>>>>Malcolm has repeatedly refuted my claims on this newsgroup that dogs
> >> >>>>>>disturb wildlife.
>
> >> >>>>>>However, the access group of which he is chairman say differently.
>
> >> >>>>>>Malcolm the liar - caught out again!
>
> >> >>>>>How typical that Angus starts his latest attack on me with a lie :-(
>
> >> >>>>>Still, it's good to see how interested he is in outdoor access :-))
>
> >> >>>>Don't compound the lie, Malcolm.
>
> >> >>>>For months you banged on about how dogs didn't disturb wildlife.
>
> >> >>>Don't lie, Angus.
>
> >> >>>You claimed, repeatedly, that dogs disturbed wildlife. What I, and
> >> >>>others, did was to ask you for some examples. Perhaps you would like to
> >> >>>repeat what you said at the time.
>
> >> >>I seem to remember saying that the RSPB didn't allow dogs because they
> >> >>disturbed wildlife and it was obvious the Woodland Trust didn't care.
>
> >> >>Look it up yourself.
>
> >> >Ah, the typical Angus answer. Unable to provide evidence to back up his
> >> >claims, he tells the person requesting the evidence to provide it
> >> >themselves :-(
>
> >> I'm not like you, Malcolm. I don't xarchive my posts. Anyone can
> >> look them up if they're keen enough.
>
> >I'm keen. Please supply the Usenet Reference No. for the post I need
> >to look up.
>
> That would mean I had to look it up.

And you are unable to do that? Malcolm's explanation goes up another
notch in my scorecard. Now, let's try again. You posted something so
you can find it easily compared to me. So let me have the reference
number for the post, please.

> If you're keen, do it yourself.

If I have to......