sci.environment

On Oct 5, 9:28 pm, "HangEveryRepubliKKKan"
wrote:
> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote
>
> >> 1998 14.57 *********************o*****
> >> 1999 14.33 *****************>>>>o
> >> 2000 14.33 *****************>>>>>o
> >> 2001 14.48 ************************o
> >> 2002 14.56 *************************o**
> >> 2003 14.55 **************************o*
> >> 2004 14.49 *************************>>o
> >> 2005 14.63 *****************************o**
> >> 2006 14.54 ***************************>>>o
>
> >> Look at all those "o"'s lined up there.
>
> "Bonzo" wrote
>
> > The "0"'s are NOT THE DATA!
> > They have created a trend which does not exist in the data.
> > Voodoo statistics!
>
> Ahahahahahahahahaha... Stupid KKKonservative KKKlown. A trendline skirts
> across the top of the data leaving equal portions of the data above and
> below. In this instane 10 dots above, and 14 below as a result of the crude
> nature of ascii graphics. Nevertheless it represents the best line that can
> be fitted to the data based on minimizing the square of the distance between
> the line and the real data. It's called a least squares curve fit.
>
> You are completely ignorant when it comes to statistics and mathematics in
> general aren't you Bonzo.
>
> Ahahahahahaha.. You don't know what statistics are, where it comes from,
> how it is used, or how to use it, and yet in your vast ignorance, you seem
> to think that you know more about science than all of the worlds scientists.
>
> "Voodoo statistics" Ahahahahahahahah... You need to go back to public
> school and take a refresher course in basic technical literacy.
>
> Stupid... Stupid.. KKKonservative KKKlown....
>
> "Bonzo" wrote
>
> > Here is the data which shows NO TREND!
>
> > 1998 366.50 2.5721 14.57
> > 1999 368.14 2.6148 14.33
> > 2000 369.41 2.6399 14.33
> > 2001 371.07 2.6672 14.48
> > 2002 373.16 2.7032 14.56
> > 2003 375.80 2.7487 14.55
> > 2004 377.55 NA 14.49
> > 2005 379.75 NA 14.63
> > 2006 381.90 NA 14.54
>
> No? Lets plot the data and find out shall we? Here it is along with the
> best linear fit to the data shown as "o".
>
> 1998 14.57 *********************o*****
> 1999 14.33 *****************>>>>o
> 2000 14.33 *****************>>>>>o
> 2001 14.48 ************************o
> 2002 14.56 *************************o**
> 2003 14.55 **************************o*
> 2004 14.49 *************************>>o
> 2005 14.63 *****************************o**
> 2006 14.54 ***************************>>>o
>
> Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.
>
> So Bonzo, who is paying you to post lies to this newsgroup?


Kid, give it up. Isn't there a teen chat forum?