uk.environment.conservation

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:33:50 +0000, Malcolm
wrote:

>
>In article ,
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:01:03 +0000, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>Malcolm has repeatedly refuted my claims on this newsgroup that dogs
>>>>disturb wildlife.
>>>>
>>>>However, the access group of which he is chairman say differently.
>>>>
>>>>Malcolm the liar - caught out again!
>>>>
>>>How typical that Angus starts his latest attack on me with a lie :-(
>>>
>>>Still, it's good to see how interested he is in outdoor access :-))
>>
>>
>>Don't compound the lie, Malcolm.
>>
>>For months you banged on about how dogs didn't disturb wildlife.
>>
>Don't lie, Angus.
>
>You claimed, repeatedly, that dogs disturbed wildlife. What I, and
>others, did was to ask you for some examples. Perhaps you would like to
>repeat what you said at the time.

I seem to remember saying that the RSPB didn't allow dogs because they
disturbed wildlife and it was obvious the Woodland Trust didn't care.

Look it up yourself.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)