uk.environment.conservation

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:12:40 +0100, Malcolm
wrote:

>
>In article ,
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:53:47 +0100, "BAC"
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Wasn't it Canna where they killed all the brown rats because of the decline
>>>in bird numbers?
>>>
>>
>>
>>See:
>>http://www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/publications/e_newsletters/teachdantirspring0
>>6/page02.pdf
>>
>>Seems it was another massacre of wildlife costing tens of thousands
>>of pounds, all to no avail.
>>
>
>Killing rats doesn't bring back fish to the sea that have either been
>overfished or have moved north through sea temperature changes.

Exactly! There was no need to kill them. Other factors seem to be
the cause of the decline.

>
>And if the shearwaters come back it definitely won't be "to no avail".

If they come back?

So after all the killing, you don't know if they'll come back?

You're a chancer, Malcolm, just like all the other SNH lackeys.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)