uk.environment.conservation

"@@^>" wrote in message
news:83p8e35g5l39oag3rp8v0j629rc009g6a3@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 21:49:27 +0100, "CWatters"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"@@^>" wrote in message
> >news:mhm7e3167k2e3hciaa6j7se2gj40r0abtn@4ax.com...
> > > I would be prepared to take her word for it, until she proves
> >> unworthy.
> >
> >So do let us know how you get on in three months.
> >
> >Meanwhile can I interest you in a scheme that's guaranteed to double your
> >money in four months? .
>
> I guess that counts you out of any open discussions!

Why do you consider my claim more unreasonable than that of Barbara Moore?

My point is that thousand of people make claims every day. Assuming they are
all trustworthy and even if they are all true... how do you decide which is
_best_ if you aren't critical of the evidence? For example there are many
claims for miricle cures - which should the NHS spend it's limited budget on
first?

If you don't want evidence, I'll expect your cheque in the post :-)