talk.environment

"Richo" wrote in message
news:dff8fc83-ae0e-4ab7-8d9c-1e731c9a2d46@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 21, 1:13 pm, "adman" <72...@hottmail.et> wrote:
> "Budikka666" wrote in message
>
> news:cde3cecb-b8e4-4d35-9c61-bdb5de5fde9f@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com...
> | On Feb 20, 5:06 pm, Jabriol The LIAR wrote:
> | > Evidence of a wise creator is seen in the very design of a tree.
> | [snip rest of juvenile drivel]
> |
> | In this thread, "Jabriol" denies he's a creationist, yet here he is in
> | the opening message insisting that there's a creator and a creation.
> |
> | In short, he's a LYING piece of shit and the most gullible creationist
> | there is.
> |
> | No surprises there.
> |
> | Budikka
>
> The most amusing thing about this 'sock puppet' stuff is that you BoZo's
> cannot tell who is who!
>
> What morons
>
> Seek professional help ---SOON!

"Köi-Lö" and "Renard Picard" definitely are Jabirol.(Ive checked)
I don't know if you are or not - I suspect not.(hence this reply)
However in a typical thread involving Jabbers he will have two or
three aliases fighting on his "side" - so the best way of not being
confussed with one of his sockpuppets is not to argue on his "side".
He is a liar, a loon and a moron and so to be seen defending him is
not the smartest thing to do.
Just freindly advice.

Cheers, mark.

While i thank you for your concern, do you really think i am going to back
off of my opinions because some k00ks that do not like what Jabbres (or
whoever) has to say?

If i agree with you, i will say that. If i agree with Jabbers i will i will
say that too.

Do atheist always try to censor thought and speech because they do not like
what they read and hear?

You sound like you follow the pack. Am i wrong?


"